Independent Contractor Rule 2026: Where the DOL Test Stands

As of October 2026, the DOL's 2024 independent contractor rule is still the regulation on the books, but the agency stopped applying it in its own investigations in May 2025 and proposed a replacement in February 2026. No final replacement rule had been published when this was reviewed, so employers face two federal tests at once.

Key takeaways

  • The 2024 rule (89 Fed. Reg. 1638, effective March 11, 2024) uses a six-factor, totality-of-the-circumstances economic reality test.
  • Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-1 (May 1, 2025) says the Wage and Hour Division no longer applies the 2024 analysis in investigations, but the 2024 rule remains in effect for private litigation.
  • The February 27, 2026 proposed rule would rescind the 2024 analysis and return to a modified 2021 framework built on two core factors: control and opportunity for profit or loss.
  • State tests such as California's ABC test can be stricter than any federal version, and they apply regardless of the federal outcome.
  • Classify to the strictest test that applies to each worker, and document the analysis.

What is the current status of the DOL independent contractor rule?

The timeline matters because each step changed something different:

DateActionPractical effect
January 7, 20212021 rule publishedIntroduced two "core factors" approach
January 10, 20242024 final rule published; effective March 11, 2024Rescinded the 2021 rule; six-factor totality test
May 1, 2025Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-1WHD stops applying the 2024 analysis in investigations; 2024 rule stays in effect for private litigation
February 27, 2026Notice of proposed rulemaking (RIN 1235-AA46)Proposes rescinding the 2024 analysis and restoring a modified 2021 framework
April 28, 2026Comment period closedFinal rule pending; check the Federal Register for publication

A search of Federal Register documents from the Wage and Hour Division in October 2026 showed the February 2026 proposal as the latest action, with no final rule yet published. A related joint employer proposal was published on April 23, 2026. Because a final rule could appear at any time, and would likely face legal challenges, check the Federal Register and the DOL rulemaking page before relying on this summary.

How does the 2024 six-factor test work?

The 2024 rule asks whether a worker is economically dependent on the employer or in business for themselves. The DOL's revised Fact Sheet #13 lists six factors, none of which is decisive:

  1. Opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill
  2. Investments by the worker and the employer
  3. Degree of permanence of the work relationship
  4. Nature and degree of control
  5. Whether the work is integral to the employer's business
  6. Skill and initiative

The fact sheet also notes that a job title, a Form 1099, the place where work is performed, licensing and the timing of pay do not determine status. That point catches many employers who treat a signed contractor agreement as the answer.

What would the 2026 proposed rule change?

According to the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on February 27, 2026, the DOL would treat two core factors as the most probative: the nature and degree of control over the work, and the worker's opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative or investment. When both point the same way, that is substantial evidence of the right classification. Other factors include the amount of skill required, the permanence of the relationship, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production. The proposal emphasizes actual practice over what a contract theoretically allows.

The proposal would also apply the same analysis under the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, which borrow the FLSA's definition of employment.

What the DOL uses in investigations today

Under FAB 2025-1, WHD enforces using the 2008 version of Fact Sheet #13, as further informed by Opinion Letter FLSA2019-6. The 2026 proposal describes the same enforcement approach with reference to Opinion Letter FLSA2025-2. In practice, the agency's current enforcement position is close to the proposed framework, while private plaintiffs can still argue under the 2024 rule.

Why the federal rule may not be your controlling test

A DOL rule interprets the FLSA only. It does not change:

  • State wage laws. California uses the ABC test for most purposes. According to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency, a worker is an employee unless the hiring entity shows the worker is free from its control, performs work outside the usual course of its business, and is customarily engaged in an independently established trade of the same nature. Prong B alone defeats many contractor arrangements.
  • Federal employment taxes. The IRS applies its own common-law test for withholding and payroll taxes.
  • Unemployment insurance and workers' compensation. Each state sets its own test, often stricter than the FLSA.
  • Court decisions. Courts decide FLSA classification cases under the economic reality test as developed in their own circuit's case law, and are not required to defer to the DOL's view.

So a worker might pass the proposed federal test and still be an employee under state wage law. That is why the strictest applicable test should drive your decision. The same multi-state logic appears in our guide to multi-state payroll with conflicting rules.

What should HR and payroll do while the rule is in flux?

Run a contractor inventory

  • Pull every vendor paid as an individual or single-member business from accounts payable, not only those HR knows about.
  • Note the work location state, length of engagement, hours pattern, who supervises the work, and whether the person does the same work as employees.
  • Flag anyone working on a continuous, open-ended basis under a manager's direction.

Score each worker against three tests

For each flagged worker, document the analysis under the 2024 six factors, the proposed core-factor framework, and the applicable state test. If any test you are subject to points to employee status, treat it as a reclassification candidate.

Plan reclassification carefully

Common mistakes

  • Relying on a contractor agreement or Form 1099 as proof of status.
  • Assuming the DOL enforcement pause protects against private lawsuits. FAB 2025-1 says the 2024 rule still applies in private litigation.
  • Converting long-tenured employees to contractor status because a new federal rule looks friendlier, without checking the state test.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the 2024 independent contractor rule still in effect?

Yes, as a regulation. It has not been rescinded as of October 2026. However, under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-1, the Wage and Hour Division no longer applies its analysis in investigations and instead uses the 2008 Fact Sheet #13 and related opinion letter guidance. The bulletin states the 2024 rule remains in effect for private litigation.

When will the new DOL contractor rule take effect?

No date is set. The proposal was published February 27, 2026, and comments closed April 28, 2026. A final rule must be published in the Federal Register, usually with a delayed effective date, and legal challenges are likely. Monitor the DOL's misclassification rulemaking page and the Federal Register rather than relying on predicted timing.

Does the federal rule override California's ABC test?

No. The DOL rule interprets only the FLSA and, if finalized as proposed, the FMLA and MSPA. California's ABC test continues to govern state wage and hour obligations for most workers in California. Where federal and state tests differ, employers must satisfy both, which in practice means the stricter one.

Can we use the proposed rule to reclassify employees as contractors?

That is risky. A proposed rule is not law, the 2024 rule still governs private lawsuits, and state tests may be stricter. Even after a final rule, actual working conditions decide status. Changing classification without changing how the work is controlled and paid invites claims. Get legal advice first.

Next steps

  1. Assign one owner to monitor the Federal Register and the DOL rulemaking page for a final rule.
  2. Complete a contractor inventory with accounts payable within the next quarter.
  3. Document a three-test analysis for each higher-risk worker and review it with counsel.
  4. Update procurement so that new individual contractor engagements require HR review.
  5. Find related guidance in our Payroll and Labor Compliance hub.

The federal contractor rule is actively changing. This article reflects the record as of October 2026 and is general information, not legal advice. Confirm the current status and your classification decisions with employment counsel.

Last reviewed: October 2026.

Sources

Comments

Popular Posts

Why Workday Onboarding Breaks Down for Frontline Employees

How to Improve the Customer Experience (CX)

Infor HCM Software Engineer Jobs: Salary Factors and Skills

UKG Union Contract and Overtime Rules for Multi-Site Food Plants

How Do I Log In and Sign In to Workday HCM

How to Search in Workday: Find Reqs, Reports, People and Tasks

New Apple Watch Health Features Will Be Available This Year, but Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar Sensors Will Not Be Available Until Next Year

The Future of Employee Healthcare Key Concerns and Strategies for 2024

How Digital Marketing Helps Your Business Grow: A Practical Plan

ERP Solution Guide: How to Choose the Best ERP for You